The Effect of Transparency and Accountability Interventions in the Extractive Sectors: An Evidence Gap Map

Published date: 10 October 2019
Last modified date: 10 October 2019
?
Hover over a bubble to see details with links to studies. Click on a link in the axes to see an explanation of the Intervention / Outcome. Select an area of the chart to zoom in. Toggle study categories on and off using the legend at the bottom of the chart. Export the chart using the menu button at the top right of the chart.
Region
Country
Study design
Population
Type of technology
Scope of Target
Created with Highcharts 4.0.1Chart context menuOutcomes InterventionsKnowledge and understanding.Citizen orcommunityengagementAttitudes and beliefs.Participation and inclusion.Collective bargaining power.Channels for negotiation andengagement.Performance of publicand private actorsTransparency of reporting.Corruption.Resource allocation.Public confidence ininstitutions/politicians.Quality/ effectiveness ofgovernment and institutions.Environmental compliance.EnvironmentEnvironmental damage andpollution.Forced displacement.ConflictandviolenceConflict.Economic.Individualorhouseholdwell-beingPsychosocial.Extractive IndustriesTransparency InitiativeOther internationaltransparency initiativeInformation on citizenrightsInformation on public/private actors' performanceCitizen monitoring andfeedbackCitizen participation indecision-makingEnvironmental auditFinancial audit
Impact evaluations
High confidence
Medium confidence
Low confidence
Protocol
Click items in the legend to toggle the category off and on in the graph. High, Medium and Low Confidence and Protocol categories apply only to Systematic Reviews. High, Medium and Low Confidence refersto confidence in conclusions about effects. It indicates the overall rating given to a systematic review based on a careful appraisal of the methods applied in a systematic review, using a standardised checklist.
loading