Intimate partner violence prevention evidence gap map

Last modified date: 12 June 2017
?
Hover over a bubble to see details with links to studies. Click on a link in the axes to see an explanation of the Intervention / Outcome. Select an area of the chart to zoom in. Toggle study categories on and off using the legend at the bottom of the chart. Export the chart using the menu button at the top right of the chart.
Region
Country
Study design
Type of technology
Scope of Target
Created with Highcharts 4.0.1Chart context menuOutcomes InterventionsAwareness & life skills (W)WomenAttitudes &self-efficacy/identity (W)Socio-economic factors (W)Incidence or reaction to IPV(W)Access to/use of responseservices (W)Awareness & life skills (M)MenAttitudes to IPV, perceptionof gender roles (M)Socio-economic factors (M)Incidence or reaction to IPV(M)Access to/use of responseservices (M)Awareness, life skills &attitudes to IPVRelationship/householdIncidence & exposure to IPVDecision-making/gender rolesResponse to IPVAttitudes to IPV &perception of gender rolesCommunity/societyIncidence, prevalence &exposure to IPVCommunity/society responseto IPVReport cost-effectivenessCross cutting themesMeasure long term impactVulnerable populations(other than women)Focus on men & boysFocus on alcohol & drugabuseEconomic, income generationIndividualSocial empowerment, skillsbuilding, awareness raisingAttention to physical orpsychological healthBystander interventionsCounselling, criticalawareness of gender rolesRelationship/householdParenting interventionsCurriculum-based activitiesat schoolExtra-curricular activitiesfor children & adolescentsCommunication & advocacycampaignsCommunityCommunity-wide mobilisationActivities & mobilisationthrough common-interestgroupsWorkplace & private sectorinterventionsCommunication & advocacycampaignsInstitution/societyPromotion of changes inlocal norms & legislationPoliceactivities/enforcement ofexisting laws & regulationICT-based interventionsEmerging trendsUsing traditions, festivalsto channel messagesMulticomponent approaches
Impact evaluations
High confidence
Medium confidence
Low confidence
Protocol
Click items in the legend to toggle the category off and on in the graph. High, Medium and Low Confidence and Protocol categories apply only to Systematic Reviews. High, Medium and Low Confidence refersto confidence in conclusions about effects. It indicates the overall rating given to a systematic review based on a careful appraisal of the methods applied in a systematic review, using a standardised checklist.
loading